Call Of Duty: World At War Xbox 360

Date: 18 / Dec / 2010

jakeyl21

World at War is worth a waddle

A lot of people don't like this game while some people love it, like myself. The campaign isn't bad but it could be better. The reason I got it was for the online game play. You can have four people online co-op in the campaign and in zombies. The Nazi Zombie feature returns in black ops but it isn't as fun as it is more tactical and they expect you to know what to do. This game is mainly for beginners as it isn't a hard story, most of the maps are medium size so its fun to play in and it has more fun and easier zombies. Overall a definite buy

Age: Under 18

Gender: Male

Date: 16 / May / 2010

WaW

Disapointing

Well what can i say apart from the game was a huge disapointment in the call of duty franchise, in my opinion. I personally think they should stick to making Modern Warfare Call of Duty games. I mean is there something the Governments not telling us, i did'nt hear anything about nazi zombies attacking a group of soldiers armed only with single shot rifles (who got significantly more points for shooting the head). Call of Duty games have been very serious up to this game, they always maintained a realistic sense of gameplay. The game should not have been a Call of Duty game, they should of called it something like (nazi zombie invasions) maybe then i would of understood why there were zombies in a WW2 game. However having said what i have, the zombies were probably the funnest part of the game, online was just rubbish and the campaign was mediocre. Mixed feelings.

Age: 18-24

Gender: Male